Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Crash using aggregate function inside a case statement in having clause #6526

Closed
monetdb-team opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed
Labels
bug Something isn't working major SQL

Comments

@monetdb-team
Copy link

Date: 2018-01-30 21:26:25 +0100
From: Trevor <>
To: SQL devs <>
Version: 11.27.11 (Jul2017-SP3)
CC: @njnes

Last updated: 2018-03-29 15:38:57 +0200

Comment 26137

Date: 2018-01-30 21:26:25 +0100
From: Trevor <>

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0
Build Identifier:

I am experiencing a crash when attempting to use an aggregate function inside a case statement in a having clause. The server restarts correctly but the crash is reproducible every time.

Below is an example. One use case for this is that I am computing a formula on aggregated data, and want to ensure no divide by zero occurs.

Are case statements in having clauses supported?

create table "t1" (
"id" int,
"c1" varchar(100),
"d1" int,
"d2" int
);

insert into "t1" values
(1, 'A', 50, 80),
(2, 'A', 200, 350),
(3, 'A', 89, 125),
(4, 'B', 4845, 13),
(5, 'B', 194, 597),
(6, 'C', 5636, 5802),
(7, 'C', 375, 3405),
(7, 'D', 365, 0),
(7, 'D', 87, 0);

-- Works
select
"c1",
sum("d1") as "d1",
sum("d2") as "d2"
from "t1"
group by "c1"
having sum("d1") < case when 5 > 10 then 500 else 400 end;

-- Works
select
"c1",
sum("d1")as "d1",
sum("d2") as "d2",
1.0 * sum("d1") / (1.0 * case when sum("d2") > 0 then sum("d2") else null end) as "formula"
from "t1"
group by "c1";

-- Crashes
select
"c1",
sum("d1")as "d1",
sum("d2") as "d2",
1.0 * sum("d1") / (1.0 * case when sum("d2") > 0 then sum("d2") else null end) as "formula"
from "t1"
group by "c1"
having (1.0 * sum("d1") / (1.0 * case when sum("d2") > 0 then sum("d2") else null end)) > 1;

Looking in merovingian.log:

2018-01-29 14:47:15 ERR test[2879]: *** Error in `/usr/bin/mserver5': double free or corruption (out): 0x00007f57200ea4b0 ***
2018-01-29 14:47:18 MSG merovingian[504]: database 'test' (2879) has crashed (dumped core)
2018-01-29 14:49:35 MSG merovingian[504]: database 'test' has crashed after start on 2018-01-29 14:42:36, attempting restart, up min/avg/max: 0s/0s/0s, crash average: 1.00 0.20 0.07 (2-0=2)
2

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:

Run queries provided in details.

Actual Results:

Database crashes.

Expected Results:

Query completes and returns correct results.

Comment 26153

Date: 2018-02-01 10:28:33 +0100
From: MonetDB Mercurial Repository <>

Changeset 567582612f6f made by Sjoerd Mullender sjoerd@acm.org in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.

For complete details, see https//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=567582612f6f

Changeset description:

Added test for bug #6526.

Comment 26210

Date: 2018-02-17 09:27:48 +0100
From: MonetDB Mercurial Repository <>

Changeset 4d9b69cdf41d made by Niels Nes niels@cwi.nl in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.

For complete details, see https//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=4d9b69cdf41d

Changeset description:

fixes for bug #6526, handle combination of aggregation in a case statement (in the having part).

Comment 26211

Date: 2018-02-17 09:29:03 +0100
From: @njnes

fixed. Pass the information of handling the 'having' properly in the case statement

Comment 26295

Date: 2018-03-29 15:38:57 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender

The Mar2018 version has been released.

@monetdb-team monetdb-team added bug Something isn't working major SQL labels Nov 30, 2020
@sjoerdmullender sjoerdmullender added this to the Ancient Release milestone Feb 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working major SQL
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants