You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The SQL standard doesn't mention the % operator for modulo/remainder, so I guess we can do whatever we want. But I agree it's a good idea to follow the lead of languages such as C where % / and * all have equal priority.
The SQL standard only mentions MOD as in
::=
<MOD
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Date: 2017-02-22 09:52:32 +0100
From: Frédéric Jolliton <<frederic.jolliton+monetdb>>
To: SQL devs <>
Version: 11.25.5 (Dec2016-SP1)
Last updated: 2017-07-17 16:07:33 +0200
Comment 25053
Date: 2017-02-22 09:52:32 +0100
From: Frédéric Jolliton <<frederic.jolliton+monetdb>>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/55.0.2883.75 Safari/537.36
Build Identifier:
The modulo operator should have the same order of evaluation as the division.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Evaluate 10 * 10 % 3
Actual Results:
10
Expected Results:
1
Comment 25084
Date: 2017-03-02 17:48:39 +0100
From: MonetDB Mercurial Repository <>
Changeset 469a57574048 made by Sjoerd Mullender sjoerd@acm.org in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.
For complete details, see http//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=469a57574048
Changeset description:
Comment 25085
Date: 2017-03-02 17:51:31 +0100
From: @sjoerdmullender
The SQL standard doesn't mention the % operator for modulo/remainder, so I guess we can do whatever we want. But I agree it's a good idea to follow the lead of languages such as C where % / and * all have equal priority.
The SQL standard only mentions MOD as in
::=
<MOD
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: