Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We should have a C implementation of mal.multiplex. #3402

Closed
monetdb-team opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

We should have a C implementation of mal.multiplex. #3402

monetdb-team opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request MAL/M5

Comments

@monetdb-team
Copy link

Date: 2013-12-02 11:07:15 +0100
From: @sjoerdmullender
To: MonetDB5 devs <>
Version: -- development
CC: @mlkersten

Last updated: 2014-10-31 14:14:18 +0100

Comment 19372

Date: 2013-12-02 11:07:15 +0100
From: @sjoerdmullender

Since there are still lots of scalar functions for which there is no bulk version, we should create a C implementation of mal.multiplex so that we can avoid the interpreter overhead of an iterator loop. In addition, we wouldn't break the dataflow.

Comment 19516

Date: 2014-02-01 11:29:26 +0100
From: @mlkersten

The mal.manifold() has been added. It implements the multiplex over multiple aligned tables and a single output table.

Comment 20364

Date: 2014-10-31 14:14:18 +0100
From: @sjoerdmullender

Oct2014 has been released.

@monetdb-team monetdb-team added enhancement New feature or request MAL/M5 labels Nov 30, 2020
@sjoerdmullender sjoerdmullender added this to the Ancient Release milestone Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request MAL/M5
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants