Date: 2013-03-12 23:22:46 +0100
From: @drstmane
To: MonetDB5 devs <>
Version: 11.15.11 (Feb2013-SP3)
CC: @mlkersten

Last updated: 2013-09-27 13:47:18 +0200

Comment 18615

Date: 2013-03-12 23:22:46 +0100
From: @drstmane

In the Feb2013 branch, tests

monetdb5/optimizer/Tests/inlineFunction.mal
and
monetdb5/optimizer/Tests/ifthencst.mal

fail since changeset 207ed7d7e03a
(cf. http://dev.monetdb.org/hg/MonetDB/rev/207ed7d7e03a)
as the optimizer(s) now seem to produce different output / MAL plans;

see also
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/showtestoutput.php?serial=46925:1a234210f142&target=GNU-Fedora-x86_64-propcheck-assert&module=monetdb5&test=monetdb5%2Foptimizer%2FinlineFunction&which=out
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/showtestoutput.php?serial=46925:1a234210f142&target=GNU-Fedora-x86_64-propcheck-assert&module=monetdb5&test=monetdb5%2Foptimizer%2Fifthencst&which=out
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/testchange.php?test=46925:1a234210f142/GNU-Fedora-x86_64-propcheck-assert/monetdb5/mTests/monetdb5%2Foptimizer%2FinlineFunction
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/testchange.php?test=46925:1a234210f142/GNU-Fedora-x86_64-propcheck-assert/monetdb5/mTests/monetdb5%2Foptimizer%2Fifthencst
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/testchange.php?test=46925:1a234210f142/GNU-Fedora-x86_64-propcheck-assert/monetdb5/mTests/optimizer%2FinlineFunction
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testweb/web/testchange.php?test=46925:1a234210f142/GNU-Fedora-x86_64-propcheck-assert/monetdb5/mTests/optimizer%2Fifthencst

In case these are acceptable / expected / intended / desired changes, the new output should be approved accordingly.
Otherwise, the respective code should be fixed.

Comment 19004

Date: 2013-08-16 07:57:38 +0200
From: MonetDB Mercurial Repository <>

Changeset ee10d1630870 made by Martin Kersten mk@cwi.nl in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.

For complete details, see http//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=ee10d1630870

Changeset description:

Look for constants after evaluation
This should fix bug #3255

Comment 19005

Date: 2013-08-16 07:59:49 +0200
From: @mlkersten

should be done with

Comment 19006

Date: 2013-08-16 08:51:50 +0200
From: @drstmane

These tests did & do fail in the Feb2013 branch, only,
but did and do not fail in the default branch.

Comment 19007

Date: 2013-08-16 13:26:25 +0200
From: @drstmane

In the Feb2013 branch, these test, and this this bug appear to be fixed by changeset 62ed11377998 (i.e., not changeset ee10d1630870).