Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

timestamp selection based on now() takes too long #2679

Closed
monetdb-team opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

timestamp selection based on now() takes too long #2679

monetdb-team opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working normal SQL

Comments

@monetdb-team
Copy link

Date: 2010-09-28 15:26:04 +0200
From: @grobian
To: SQL devs <>
Version: 2.40.1 (Oct2010) [obsolete]
CC: @njnes, @drstmane

Last updated: 2011-03-28 17:31:33 +0200

Comment 14947

Date: 2010-09-28 15:26:04 +0200
From: @grobian

sql>select max(emit_time) from sensor_readings;
+----------------------------+
| L14 |
+============================+
| 2010-09-28 13:16:25.000000 |
+----------------------------+
1 tuple (78.778ms)
sql>select now() - interval '30' second;
+----------------------------------+
| current_timestamp |
+==================================+
| 2010-09-28 13:16:09.000000+00:00 |
+----------------------------------+
1 tuple (0.236ms)
sql>select count() from sensor_readings where emit_time >= '2010-09-28 13:16:09.000000+00:00';
+------+
| L15 |
+======+
| 323 |
+------+
1 tuple (54.039ms)
sql>select count(
) from sensor_readings where emit_time >= now() - interval '30' second;
+------+
| L12 |
+======+
| 0 |
+------+
1 tuple (49.3s)

(notice the 50 seconds, clearly a full scan is done)

I cannot reproduce this on an almost empty database, so it must be size related:

sql>select count() from sensor_readings;
+----------+
| L4 |
+==========+
| 22514029 |
+----------+
1 tuple (2.067ms)
sql>plan select count(
) from sensor_readings where emit_time >= now() - interval '30' second;
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| rel |
+==============================================================================+
| project ( |
| | group by ( |
| | | select ( |
| | | | table(sys.sensor_readings) [ sensor_readings.src_ip, sensor_readings.e |
: mit_time, sensor_readings.%TID% NOT NULL ] :
| | | ) [ convert(sensor_readings.emit_time) >= sql_sub(current_timestamp, 30) |
: ] :
| | ) [ ] [ count NOT NULL as L5 ] |
| ) [ L5 NOT NULL ] |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
7 tuples (0.488ms)
sql>

Comment 14948

Date: 2010-09-28 15:32:57 +0200
From: @grobian

after some thinking: query does a full scan which takes 50 seconds, so the 30 seconds limit never matches anything.

Comment 14949

Date: 2010-09-28 15:35:50 +0200
From: @grobian

workaround :)

sql>declare ts timestamp;
sql>set ts = now() - interval '30' second; select count() from sensor_readings where emit_time >= ts;
+------+
| L4 |
+======+
| 229 |
+------+
1 tuple (53.620ms)
sql>set ts = now() - interval '30' second; select count(
) from sensor_readings where emit_time >= ts;
+------+
| L5 |
+======+
| 234 |
+------+
1 tuple (51.480ms)

Comment 15014

Date: 2010-10-08 23:45:28 +0200
From: @drstmane

Did/could you profile (TRACE) the query with now() in the predicate to analyze where the time is spent?

Comment 15141

Date: 2010-10-28 13:49:49 +0200
From: @grobian

tracing the query acutally never ends (or takes more time than my patience allows)

Comment 15242

Date: 2010-12-01 23:23:45 +0100
From: @njnes

the table definition is missing. To debug this query (using explain/plan etc) needs all ddl statements.

Comment 15248

Date: 2010-12-02 18:29:39 +0100
From: @grobian

here you go:

CREATE TABLE "sensor_readings" (
"src_ip" VARCHAR(15),
"recv_time" TIMESTAMP,
"emit_time" TIMESTAMP,
"location" VARCHAR(30),
"type" VARCHAR(30),
"value" VARCHAR(30)
);

Comment 15256

Date: 2010-12-03 21:12:26 +0100
From: @njnes

time is spend in a bat-iterator loop which is converting the timestamp column
to a timestamp with time zone. This seems like a waste of time.

Comment 15257

Date: 2010-12-03 21:27:41 +0100
From: @njnes

the conversion can be skipped, which solves the slow down.

Comment 15260

Date: 2010-12-03 21:33:12 +0100
From: @njnes

Changeset 455912904d45 made by Niels Nes niels@cwi.nl in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.

For complete details, see http//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=455912904d45

Changeset description:

avoid useless conversions (fixes Bug #2679).

Comment 15270

Date: 2010-12-04 09:54:00 +0100
From: @grobian

This is a bug on oct2010, but it was fixed on default/current.

Is it possible to be backported?

Comment 15274

Date: 2010-12-04 11:59:58 +0100
From: @njnes

Changeset 38195aa0606a made by Niels Nes niels@cwi.nl in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.

For complete details, see http//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=38195aa0606a

Changeset description:

avoid useless conversions (fixes Bug #2679).
(transplanted from 455912904d45399b6514a0f9f9521054bbefcea7)

Comment 15275

Date: 2010-12-04 12:00:22 +0100
From: @grobian

manually backported this fix

Comment 15632

Date: 2011-03-28 17:31:33 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender

The Mar2011 version has been released.

@monetdb-team monetdb-team added bug Something isn't working normal SQL labels Nov 30, 2020
@sjoerdmullender sjoerdmullender added this to the Ancient Release milestone Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working normal SQL
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants