You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
MonetDB lacks a master/slave replication scheme, such as e.g. MySQL has.
Many ingredients are already implemented in the development branch. The master and slave properties are being handled by monetdb and merovingian, and a merovingian_url property is passed onto each database being started by merovingian.
The feature should be finished in a generic way, e.g. it shouldn't only just work on the same machine by accident because the IPs of master and slave are the same.
master/slave replication: remove non-functional work in progress
The master/slave replication work will be committed in a separate
branch that will track the progress for bug #2618.
For as long as that work is not finished, we remove the work in progress
from the default (and so release) branche not to confuse users of the
system by presenting options for non-functional bits.
Date: 2010-07-16 13:43:23 +0200
From: @grobian
To: MonetDB5 devs <>
Version: -- development
CC: @mlkersten, @yzchang
Last updated: 2015-08-28 13:41:43 +0200
Comment 14436
Date: 2010-07-16 13:43:23 +0200
From: @grobian
MonetDB lacks a master/slave replication scheme, such as e.g. MySQL has.
Many ingredients are already implemented in the development branch. The master and slave properties are being handled by monetdb and merovingian, and a merovingian_url property is passed onto each database being started by merovingian.
The feature should be finished in a generic way, e.g. it shouldn't only just work on the same machine by accident because the IPs of master and slave are the same.
Comment 16029
Date: 2011-07-29 10:59:40 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender
Apr2011-SP2 has been released.
Comment 16266
Date: 2011-09-16 15:09:14 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender
The Aug2011 version has been released.
Comment 17355
Date: 2012-06-12 08:36:18 +0200
From: @grobian
as long as this is not working, we should remove the handles from monetdbd for this
Comment 17359
Date: 2012-06-13 16:03:32 +0200
From: @grobian
Changeset 877b04706e12 made by Fabian Groffen fabian@cwi.nl in the MonetDB repo, refers to this bug.
For complete details, see http//devmonetdborg/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=877b04706e12
Changeset description:
Comment 18105
Date: 2012-11-27 15:08:37 +0100
From: @yzchang
Don't know if possible and how to add test for this
Comment 19963
Date: 2014-08-06 14:59:06 +0200
From: @mlkersten
This request is dealt with in MonetDB Solutions context.
The code becomes available in an upcoming feature release.
Comment 21183
Date: 2015-08-28 13:41:43 +0200
From: @sjoerdmullender
Jul2015 has been released.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: